Artificial Sweeteners and Your Gut Microbiome

Medically reviewed and written by Dr Zeeshan Afzal (MBBS), Medical Officer at Welzo. Last updated: July 2026. This article is for general information and is not a substitute for personalised medical advice.

The question of sweeteners and gut health has moved from fringe wellness blogs into peer-reviewed journals and, in 2023, into formal World Health Organization guidance. If you drink diet soft drinks, chew sugar-free gum, or add a sachet of sweetener to your coffee, you are consuming compounds that pass through — and in some cases interact directly with — the trillions of bacteria living in your large intestine. Whether that matters is one of the most actively debated questions in gut health in the UK today.

This guide summarises what the human evidence actually shows, sweetener by sweetener, without overstating the risks or dismissing them. If you are already working on your digestion, you may also want to explore the full Welzo gut health range and our clinically formulated probiotics, including Akkermansia muciniphila, modified citrus pectin powder, Welzo Ultra Purity Berberine and Welzo Ultra Purity TUDCA.

Key takeaways

• Not all sweeteners behave the same way in the gut. Aspartame is broken down before it reaches the colon; sucralose, saccharin, acesulfame K and most sugar alcohols largely are not.
• A 2022 randomised controlled trial in Cell found that all four tested sweeteners altered the stool microbiome in healthy adults, and that saccharin and sucralose measurably impaired glucose tolerance — at doses below the acceptable daily intake.
• Responses appear to be highly individual. Two people can consume the same sweetener and show opposite metabolic responses depending on their starting microbiome.
• Sugar alcohols (sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, xylitol) are the most common cause of sweetener-related bloating, wind and loose stools — this is a well-established osmotic and fermentation effect, not a controversial one.
• The WHO advises against using non-sugar sweeteners for long-term weight control, but this is a conditional recommendation based on low-certainty evidence, and it is not a safety warning.
• Sweeteners are almost always the smaller variable. Fibre diversity, ultra-processed food intake, alcohol, sleep and antibiotics all shape the microbiome more powerfully.

Table of contents

• What counts as a sweetener? The five families
• How sweeteners actually reach your gut microbiome
• What the human evidence shows, sweetener by sweetener
• Sweeteners, bloating and IBS
• Sweeteners and the gut barrier
• Beyond the gut: metabolic and cardiovascular signals
• How UK and EU regulators assess sweetener safety
• Which sweeteners are gentlest on the gut?
• A practical, evidence-based approach
• When to speak to your GP
• Frequently asked questions
• References

What counts as a sweetener? The five families

"Sweetener" is a commercial category, not a chemical one. The compounds grouped under it are structurally unrelated and behave very differently once swallowed. Understanding which family a sweetener belongs to tells you more about its likely gut effects than any marketing claim about being "natural".

1. High-intensity artificial sweeteners

Synthetic molecules hundreds of times sweeter than sucrose, used in milligram quantities: sucralose (E955), aspartame (E951), saccharin (E954), acesulfame potassium (E950), neotame and advantame. These dominate diet soft drinks, sugar-free squash, protein powders and tabletop sachets.

2. Plant-derived high-intensity sweeteners

Steviol glycosides (E960) from Stevia rebaudiana and mogrosides from monk fruit. Marketed as natural, but the finished ingredient is a purified extract rather than a whole plant.

3. Sugar alcohols (polyols)

Sorbitol (E420), mannitol (E421), xylitol (E967), maltitol (E965), isomalt, lactitol and erythritol (E968). These are bulk sweeteners with roughly the sweetness of sugar, used in sugar-free gum, mints, "diabetic" chocolate and low-carb baking. They are also the "P" in FODMAP.

4. Rare sugars

Allulose and tagatose — sugars that are absorbed or excreted with minimal metabolism. Allulose is not currently authorised as a novel food in Great Britain or the EU, so you will mostly encounter it in imported products.

5. Nutritive syrups marketed as healthy

Honey, agave, date syrup, coconut sugar. Nutritionally these are still free sugars. They contain trace minerals and, in honey's case, small amounts of oligosaccharides, but they raise blood glucose and feed the same processes as table sugar.

Quick comparison table

How sweeteners actually reach your gut microbiome

The dose that matters to your microbiome is not the dose on the label — it is the fraction that survives the small intestine. Three routes explain most of what happens:

Route one: digested before the colon

Aspartame is hydrolysed by digestive enzymes in the small intestine into phenylalanine, aspartic acid and a small quantity of methanol. Very little intact aspartame reaches the large bowel, which is why direct microbial effects are harder to demonstrate for aspartame than for sucralose or saccharin.

Route two: absorbed and excreted in urine

Acesulfame potassium is absorbed almost completely and excreted unchanged by the kidneys. Erythritol behaves similarly — roughly 90% is absorbed in the small intestine and excreted in urine, which is why it causes far less bloating than other polyols. Classic work published in the British Journal of Nutrition confirmed that human gut bacteria essentially do not ferment erythritol.

Route three: delivered to the colon largely intact

This is the group that matters most for microbiome diversity. The majority of ingested sucralose is not absorbed and passes into the colon. Saccharin is only partly absorbed. Sorbitol, mannitol and maltitol are absorbed slowly and incompletely — roughly 30% of a polyol dose crosses the small intestinal wall, leaving the rest to draw in water osmotically and to be fermented by resident bacteria. Steviol glycosides are not absorbed as intact molecules at all; colonic bacteria cleave off the glucose units and release steviol, which is then absorbed and processed by the liver.

Once a compound reaches the colon, it can plausibly change which species thrive, alter the short-chain fatty acids those species produce, and shift the overall balance towards or away from gut dysbiosis. Whether it actually does so, and whether that translates into anything you would notice, is where the evidence gets more interesting.

What the human evidence shows, sweetener by sweetener

The landmark trial: Suez and colleagues, Cell, 2022

This is the study that changed the conversation. Researchers at the Weizmann Institute recruited 120 healthy adults who did not habitually consume sweeteners and randomised them to sachets of saccharin, sucralose, aspartame or stevia — or to control sachets containing the glucose vehicle alone, or no supplement — for two weeks. Crucially, the doses used were below the acceptable daily intake.

Three findings stood out:

• Each of the four sweeteners produced a distinct change in the stool and oral microbiome and in the plasma metabolome. This included stevia, which is often assumed to be inert.
• Saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycaemic responses — participants handled a glucose load less well after two weeks. Aspartame and stevia did not produce this effect.
• When stool from the strongest and weakest human responders was transplanted into germ-free mice, the mice reproduced their donor's glycaemic pattern. That moves the finding from correlation towards causation: the microbiome was carrying the effect.

The trial also demonstrated something that undermines every blanket rule about sweeteners: responses were person-specific. Baseline microbiome features predicted who would respond badly to sucralose and who would not. This is one reason a gut microbiome test is increasingly used to personalise dietary advice rather than applying population averages.

The important caveats, raised by independent experts at the time: two weeks is short, the glycaemic changes were modest, and no clinical outcomes such as diabetes incidence were measured. This is a mechanistic signal, not proof of harm.

Sucralose

Sucralose has the most consistent negative signal across study types. In a 2025 controlled fermentation study using minibioreactor arrays seeded with human faecal microbiota, sucralose significantly reduced microbial diversity and enriched Enterobacteriaceae — the family that includes E. coli and several opportunistic pathogens. Saccharin produced similar diversity losses. By contrast, rebaudioside A (from stevia) and xylitol were markedly less disruptive, and appeared to favour beneficial families such as Lachnospiraceae.

A separate 2023 laboratory study identified sucralose-6-acetate, a compound present as a trace impurity in commercial sucralose and also formed in the gut after ingestion. In cell-based assays it was genotoxic and damaged the tight junctions between intestinal epithelial cells. The authors noted that the European Food Safety Authority's threshold of toxicological concern for genotoxic substances is 0.15 micrograms per person per day, and calculated that a single sucralose-sweetened drink could exceed it. This work is in vitro and has been contested by manufacturers; it has not led regulators to change sucralose's authorisation. It is a flag for further research rather than a settled conclusion — but it is directly relevant if you are already investigating gut barrier function or wondering whether leaky gut is real.

Saccharin

Saccharin was the original signal. In 2014 the same Weizmann group published in Nature that saccharin induced glucose intolerance in mice by altering the gut microbiota, and that transferring the altered microbiota reproduced the effect. The 2022 human trial confirmed the pattern in people. Saccharin is now uncommon in UK retail products but still appears in some sweetener blends and pharmaceuticals.

Acesulfame potassium

Ace-K is absorbed and renally excreted, so colonic exposure is low. Rodent studies have reported microbiome perturbation and weight gain, and the minibioreactor work found that Ace-K increased diversity indices while disrupting the microbial network structure — a pattern the authors suggested could reduce the ecosystem's resilience over time. Human data are sparse.

Aspartame

Because aspartame is digested before reaching the colon, it has the weakest mechanistic case for direct microbiome effects, and the 2022 trial found no impairment of glucose tolerance in the aspartame group. Aspartame's controversy sits elsewhere: in July 2023 the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified it as Group 2B, possibly carcinogenic to humans, based on limited evidence relating to liver cancer. On the same day, the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight. For a 70 kg adult that is roughly 9 to 14 cans of a diet soft drink per day, every day, from all sources combined. Group 2B is a hazard classification, not a measure of real-world risk at dietary exposures.

Stevia and monk fruit

Steviol glycosides reach the colon and are metabolised there by Bacteroides species — so they unquestionably interact with your bacteria. The question is whether that interaction is harmful. Most human data suggest a neutral effect on microbiome composition; some in vitro work suggests mild prebiotic activity favouring Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. However, the 2022 Cell trial did detect distinct microbiome and metabolome shifts in the stevia group, even without a glycaemic penalty. Monk fruit (mogroside V) has shown prebiotic potential in laboratory and animal work, but robust human microbiome trials are essentially absent. "Natural" is not the same as "studied".

Sugar alcohols

Here the evidence is unambiguous and predates the microbiome era. Polyols are incompletely absorbed, pull water into the bowel osmotically, and are fermented to gas. A Monash University study found that a 10 g dose of sorbitol or mannitol significantly increased gastrointestinal symptoms in people with IBS compared with healthy controls. This is why sugar-free products carry the warning that excess consumption may have a laxative effect. Erythritol is the exception — because it is absorbed and barely fermented, it causes far fewer symptoms at typical doses.

Antimicrobial resistance: an emerging question

One 2022 laboratory study reported that saccharin, sucralose, aspartame and acesulfame K increased the horizontal transfer of a multi-drug resistance plasmid between gut bacteria, apparently by raising reactive oxygen species. This is early, in vitro, and not something to change behaviour over — but it illustrates that sweeteners can act on bacteria in ways that have nothing to do with being a food.

Sweeteners, bloating and IBS

If you have noticed symptoms after sugar-free products, polyols are the overwhelmingly likely culprit — not sucralose or aspartame. The mechanism is mechanical rather than mysterious: undigested polyol draws water into the small bowel, and colonic bacteria ferment what arrives, producing hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane. In a sensitive gut, that combination produces distension, cramping, urgency or loose stools within a few hours.

Practical implications:

• Sugar-free gum and mints are a common hidden source. Three or four pieces can deliver several grams of sorbitol or maltitol.
• "Diabetic" chocolate, protein bars and low-carb ice cream are frequent offenders.
• Some liquid medicines and chewable supplements are sweetened with sorbitol or maltitol.
• People with IBS-C sometimes find the laxative effect genuinely useful at a controlled dose.

If this pattern sounds familiar, the structured route is a low FODMAP diet supervised by a dietitian, using the FODMAP food list for the elimination phase and a proper FODMAP reintroduction to establish your personal tolerance. It is also worth reviewing other foods that cause bloating, understanding your IBS type, and considering targeted supplements for bloating or supplements for IBS alongside dietary changes. For acute wind, see our guide to trapped wind relief.

Sweeteners and the gut barrier

The intestinal epithelium is a single cell layer sealed by tight junction proteins. When those seals loosen, bacterial fragments such as lipopolysaccharide can cross into circulation and trigger low-grade inflammation — the phenomenon popularly called leaky gut and known clinically as increased intestinal permeability.

Two strands of evidence connect sweeteners to this. First, the sucralose-6-acetate work described above showed direct tight junction damage in human intestinal tissue models. Second, a loss of diversity and a shift towards Enterobacteriaceae reduces production of butyrate, the short-chain fatty acid that colonocytes use as their primary fuel and that helps maintain barrier integrity.

Both strands are indirect and neither has been demonstrated to cause disease in humans at dietary exposures. If barrier health is a priority for you — for example alongside a diagnosed inflammatory condition — the better-evidenced levers are fibre diversity, adequate butyrate substrate and, where appropriate, targeted supplements. Our guides to butyrate supplements, zinc carnosine and supplements for leaky gut cover the evidence in detail.

Beyond the gut: metabolic and cardiovascular signals

The WHO position on non-sugar sweeteners

In May 2023 the World Health Organization published a guideline recommending that non-sugar sweeteners should not be used to control body weight or reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases. The systematic review found that sweeteners produce short-term weight reductions in randomised trials when they replace sugar, but that long-term observational cohorts associate higher intake with increased BMI, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and mortality.

Three things are essential to read correctly here. The recommendation is conditional, meaning WHO itself has limited confidence in it. The underlying evidence was rated low certainty. And it is not a safety warning — it does not say sweeteners are unsafe, and it explicitly excludes people with pre-existing diabetes. Several nutrition research groups have publicly called for the evidence base to be re-evaluated, arguing that reverse causation in cohort studies (people at higher metabolic risk switch to diet drinks) is inadequately handled.

Erythritol and xylitol

The most concrete recent signal concerns two polyols. A 2023 study in Nature Medicine found that higher circulating erythritol was associated with three-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.80 (95% CI 1.18–2.77) in a US validation cohort and 2.21 (95% CI 1.20–4.07) in a European cohort, comparing highest to lowest quartiles. Mechanistic work showed erythritol enhanced platelet reactivity and thrombosis in laboratory models.

A 2024 interventional study in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology gave healthy volunteers a single erythritol drink at a dose typical of a sugar-free product and measured increased platelet reactivity afterwards. A parallel 2024 paper in the European Heart Journal reported the same pattern for xylitol.

This evidence has real limitations. Erythritol is also produced endogenously from glucose via the pentose phosphate pathway, so high blood levels may partly be a marker of metabolic stress rather than a consequence of diet. No long-term randomised trial has tested erythritol's cardiovascular safety. The reasonable interpretation is caution rather than alarm, particularly for people with existing cardiovascular disease, diabetes or metabolic syndrome. If you are exploring metabolic support, see our comparisons of berberine versus metformin and our guide to gut health and blood sugar.

How UK and EU regulators assess sweetener safety

Every sweetener authorised for sale in Great Britain has been through a toxicological assessment that establishes an acceptable daily intake (ADI): the amount, per kilogram of body weight, that can be consumed daily across a lifetime without appreciable risk. ADIs incorporate a safety factor, typically 100-fold below the highest dose showing no observed adverse effect in animal studies.

The key point for this discussion is that ADIs were set to address classical toxicology — organ damage, carcinogenicity, reproductive effects. They were not designed to answer microbiome questions, which is precisely why the Suez trial's finding of effects below the ADI attracted so much attention. Regulatory safety and microbiome neutrality are different claims.

UK labelling rules require products to state "with sweetener(s)" near the product name, and products containing aspartame must declare that they contain a source of phenylalanine — important for anyone with phenylketonuria.

Which sweeteners are gentlest on the gut?

No sweetener has been proven harmful at normal intakes, and none has been proven completely inert. Based on current human evidence, a defensible ranking from gentlest to most cautious looks like this:

A practical, evidence-based approach

Step one: work out whether sweeteners are actually your problem

Keep a two-week symptom and food diary, noting sweetener sources specifically — including gum, mints, medicines and supplements. Track stool form using the Bristol stool chart. If symptoms cluster within a few hours of sugar-free products, polyols are the likely driver. If there is no clear pattern, sweeteners are probably not the main variable and your energy is better spent elsewhere.

Step two: reduce total sweetened intake rather than swapping brands

Substituting one high-intensity sweetener for another rarely resolves anything, because it does not address the underlying habit of a constant sweet signal. Diluting squash further, alternating diet drinks with sparkling water, and reducing rather than replacing sweetness in coffee and tea are more durable changes. This also reduces ultra-processed food intake, which is a far stronger determinant of microbiome composition than any single additive.

Step three: feed the microbiome you want

Every credible route to a resilient microbiome runs through plant diversity and fermentable fibre. The evidence-based targets are 30 g of fibre daily and 30 different plants a week. Our guides to increasing fibre without bloating, prebiotic foods, high fibre foods, polyphenols and fermented foods cover the practical detail, and our article on increasing bacterial diversity pulls it together.

Step four: consider targeted supplementation

Supplements do not undo a poor diet, but they can be useful adjuncts where diversity is low or after a disruption such as antibiotics. Relevant options include a well-characterised multi-strain probiotic, a prebiotic supplement, Akkermansia muciniphila for mucus layer support, and modified citrus pectin as a fermentable fibre. For metabolic and hepatobiliary support, Welzo Ultra Purity Berberine and Welzo Ultra Purity TUDCA are covered in our guides to berberine interactions and TUDCA side effects. If you are new to probiotics, start with how to choose a probiotic and when to take them, and read about possible side effects first. Always check for interactions with prescribed medication.

Step five: keep perspective on sugar

The alternative to sweeteners is usually sugar, not water. Free sugar intake is a well-established driver of obesity, dental caries and type 2 diabetes, and the microbiome consequences of a high-sugar, low-fibre diet are considerably better documented than those of sweeteners. For most people, switching from full-sugar to diet drinks remains a net improvement — while switching from either to water is better still.

When to speak to your GP

Sweetener-related symptoms are, by definition, mild and reversible. Seek medical advice promptly if you have any of the following, as these are not attributable to sweeteners:

• Blood in your stool, or black tarry stools
• Unintentional weight loss
• A persistent change in bowel habit lasting more than three weeks, particularly if you are over 50
• Difficulty swallowing, persistent vomiting, or a lump in the abdomen
• Iron deficiency anaemia without an obvious cause
• Night-time symptoms that wake you from sleep

See our guide on when to see your GP about stomach symptoms and information on bowel cancer screening in the UK. If symptoms persist after removing polyols, discuss testing for coeliac disease, SIBO or inflammatory bowel disease with your clinician.

Frequently asked questions

Do sweeteners damage your gut microbiome?

Some do change it. A randomised trial of 120 healthy adults found that saccharin, sucralose, aspartame and stevia each altered the stool microbiome within two weeks, and that saccharin and sucralose also impaired glucose tolerance. Whether "change" equals "damage" has not been established, because no study has followed people long enough to measure clinical outcomes. Sugar alcohols cause symptoms reliably, but through osmosis and fermentation rather than lasting microbial harm.

Which sweetener is best for gut health?

On current evidence, steviol glycosides and monk fruit have the most neutral human microbiome data, and erythritol causes the least fermentation of any sugar alcohol. None is proven to benefit the gut. The safest position is to use whichever sweetener you tolerate, in the smallest amount that works, rather than treating any product as gut-friendly.

Is sucralose bad for your gut?

Sucralose has the most consistent adverse signal of the common sweeteners. It reaches the colon largely intact, reduced microbial diversity and enriched Enterobacteriaceae in controlled fermentation models, and impaired glycaemic responses in the 2022 human trial. Separate laboratory work found its metabolite sucralose-6-acetate damaged intestinal tight junctions. None of this proves harm at dietary intakes in humans, but it is the sweetener with the strongest case for moderation.

Can sweeteners cause bloating and wind?

Yes — sugar alcohols very commonly do. Sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, xylitol and isomalt are poorly absorbed, draw water into the bowel and are fermented to gas. A 10 g dose of sorbitol or mannitol produced significant symptoms in people with IBS in Monash University research. High-intensity sweeteners such as sucralose and aspartame are much less likely to cause acute bloating.

Is stevia safe for the gut?

Stevia has a reassuring profile overall. Human studies generally show neutral effects on microbiome composition, and it did not impair glucose tolerance in the 2022 randomised trial. However, that same trial did detect distinct microbiome and metabolome shifts in the stevia group, so it is not biologically inert. Steviol glycosides are metabolised by colonic bacteria, which is exactly why they interact with the microbiome at all.

Should I be worried about erythritol?

Erythritol is the gentlest sugar alcohol on the gut, but it carries an unresolved cardiovascular question. Observational and mechanistic studies have linked higher blood erythritol to platelet activation and to three-year cardiovascular event risk, with hazard ratios around 1.8 to 2.2 comparing highest to lowest quartiles. Because the body also makes erythritol internally, causation is unclear. If you have established cardiovascular disease, diabetes or metabolic syndrome, it is reasonable to limit erythritol and discuss it with your doctor.

Did the WHO say sweeteners are unsafe?

No. The 2023 WHO guideline advised against using non-sugar sweeteners as a strategy for weight control or reducing non-communicable disease risk. It was a conditional recommendation based on low-certainty evidence, it did not withdraw any safety approval, and it explicitly did not apply to people with pre-existing diabetes.

Is aspartame a carcinogen?

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified aspartame as Group 2B, "possibly carcinogenic to humans", in July 2023, based on limited evidence relating to liver cancer. On the same day the WHO/FAO expert committee reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight, equivalent to roughly 9 to 14 cans of diet soft drink per day for a 70 kg adult. Group 2B reflects the strength of evidence for a hazard, not the size of risk at normal intakes.

Are natural sweeteners better than artificial ones for gut health?

Not automatically. Stevia and monk fruit have reassuring but thin evidence bases, while honey, agave and date syrup are free sugars with the same metabolic effects as table sugar. Meanwhile, some polyols that occur naturally in fruit — sorbitol in particular — are among the most reliable causes of digestive symptoms. Judge a sweetener by its behaviour in the gut, not by its origin story.

How long does it take the gut to recover after cutting out sweeteners?

Symptoms driven by polyols usually settle within a few days of removing the source. Microbiome composition responds to dietary change within days to weeks, but rebuilding diversity is a slower process driven mainly by fibre variety rather than by removing any single ingredient. Most people see meaningful change over four to twelve weeks of consistently higher plant diversity. Read more in our gut reset protocol.

References

1. Suez J, Cohen Y, Valdés-Mas R, et al. Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance. Cell. 2022;185(18):3307–3328. PubMed
2. World Health Organization. WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline. 15 May 2023. who.int
3. World Health Organization. Use of Non-Sugar Sweeteners: WHO Guideline. Geneva; 2023. NCBI Bookshelf
4. World Health Organization. Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released. 14 July 2023. who.int
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released. iarc.who.int
6. Witkowski M, Nemet I, Alamri H, et al. The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk. Nature Medicine. 2023;29:710–718. Nature Medicine
7. Witkowski M, Nemet I, Li XS, et al. Ingestion of the non-nutritive sweetener erythritol, but not glucose, enhances platelet reactivity and thrombosis potential in healthy volunteers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024. AHA Journals
8. Witkowski M, Nemet I, Li XS, et al. Xylitol is prothrombotic and associated with cardiovascular risk. European Heart Journal. 2024;45:2439–2452. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae244
9. Schiffman SS, Scholl EH, Furey TS, Nagle HT. Toxicological and pharmacokinetic properties of sucralose-6-acetate and its parent sucralose: in vitro screening assays. J Toxicol Environ Health B. 2023. doi:10.1080/10937404.2023.2213903
10. North Carolina State University. Chemical found in common sweetener damages DNA. EurekAlert! 31 May 2023. eurekalert.org
11. Synthetic vs. non-synthetic sweeteners: their differential effects on gut microbiome diversity and function. PMC12119465. PubMed Central
12. Artificial sweeteners: a double-edged sword for the gut microbiome. PMC12025785. PubMed Central
13. Non-caloric artificial sweeteners modulate conjugative transfer of multi-drug resistance plasmid in the gut microbiota. PMC9762752. PubMed Central
14. Monash University FODMAP team. Sweeteners and the low FODMAP diet. monashfodmap.com
15. Monash University FODMAP team. Food additives and FODMAPs. monashfodmap.com
16. US Food and Drug Administration. Aspartame and other sweeteners in food. fda.gov
17. Science Media Centre. Expert reaction to study looking at the effect of non-nutritive sweeteners on human microbiomes and glycaemic levels. 19 August 2022. sciencemediacentre.org
18. Khan TA, Lee JJ, Ayoub-Charette S, et al. WHO guideline on the use of non-sugar sweeteners: a need for reconsideration. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023;77:1009–1013. Nature

About the author

Dr Zeeshan Afzal (MBBS) is a qualified medical doctor and Medical Officer at Welzo. He writes and reviews Welzo's digestive health content, with a focus on translating primary research into practical guidance for patients. All clinical claims in this article are referenced to peer-reviewed literature or to statements from regulatory bodies including the World Health Organization, the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the US Food and Drug Administration.

Medical disclaimer

This article is intended for general information and education. It does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis or treatment, and it should not be used to replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. The evidence on sweeteners and gut health is evolving, and much of it comes from short-term trials, laboratory models or observational studies that cannot establish causation. Do not start, stop or change any supplement, medication or diet on the basis of this article alone. If you are pregnant or breastfeeding, have a diagnosed gastrointestinal, metabolic or cardiovascular condition, have phenylketonuria, or take prescription medication, speak to your GP, pharmacist or a registered dietitian before making changes.

Image credits

All images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons under free licences (public domain or Creative Commons). No copyrighted or licensed stock imagery has been used. Attribution details for each file are available on its Wikimedia Commons file page.